AskImamDarul Iftaa Mahmudiyyah (AskImam)

How to negate Qadiani's beliefs and if I cant, can I leave the person on his haal?

Fatwa 2806English
Beliefs and Practices (Aqeedah)

Question

AssalamoAlaikum, One of my sunni friends became Qadiani a few years back. I unsuccessfully tried with my limited knowledge to correct him. He did Istakhara and is convinced Qadianism is right. He is in Lahore and has also taken on a few Molana as challenge, who could not convince him. Now he even preaches it over the net etc, and has convinced a few people himself! He writes to me now and then asking me to accept it. He asked me to do Istakhara as well, but Mufti Zubair from South Africa(who was in UK then) stopped, me saying it is not permissible to do so on such matters which r clear in the Quran. My question are: 1)Is it somewhere clearly said in the Holy book about these issues? 2)How do i tackle him? I am sure u know their arguments and all. 3)If I cant, do i leave him as he is? Considering that he is spreading his words very fast and very vast, it might not be good. JazakAllah Khair, and hope to read from u soon. May Allah guide us all. Please remember me, and us all in your dua'as. Wassalam.

Answer

Kindly find information below

Also, kindly refer to http://www.irshad.org/idara

Salaams

QADIANISM - IN REPLY TO MIRZA TAHIR

2 - Mirza Ghulam Ahmad - a False Prophet

Qadianis Disobey their Sire Mirza Ghulam Ahmad

In his book 'Anjam e Atham', Mirza Ghulam Ahmad Qadiani had expressed his determination that he would never address the Ulema in future. He was adamant. Note his vehement style:

"We have today finalised the preachings which were obligatory on us.. and it is our resolve that we shall not address the Ulema after these clarifications.. and that is the end of discourses from our side".

When Mirza Qadiani had conclusively proclaimed in 1897 his refusal to reopen any discourse with the Ulema in future, does his promise which according to your belief was:

"And he does not speak from inclination of his self; This is but revelation sent down".

stand abrogated or is it that Mirza's progeny does not care a fig for all those promises, deeds and words which Mirza put forth?

MIRZA GHULAM AHMAD QADIANI-- LIAR, APOSTATE, DUALIST-INFIDEL You have challenged the Ulema of the Ummat for a Mubahala. Remember, such engagements are final touchstones which distinguish between right and wrong, truth and falsehood. You seem to be going in for this Mubahala because you are not sure of the truthfulness of your Sire, even after a lapse of one century. Evidently you and your party members distrust your Patriarch.

Praise be to Allah, the entire Islamic Ummah including myself - the most incompetent man of Ummat - don't have least of the least doubt that Mirza Ghulam Ahmad Qadiani was a liar. Final, decisive and unanimous is Islamic Ummah in the belief that after Allah's Prophet any claimant to prophethood, is a liar, apostate and dualist-infidel. This is in accordance with th Prophetic words:

"Thirty liars (will appear before the Day of Judgement) and each one of them will claim to be a Prophet of Allah." (Tirmizi)

Mirza Ghulam Ahmad Qadiani is included in this list.

The statement that "Mirza's marriage was solemnised in the sky!" is one example of Mirza's falsehood. Allah the Exalted, Supreme in Perfection, Eminent in Wisdom, has provided us numerous conclusive proofs of the falsehood of Mirza Ghulam Ahmad Qadiani--the Musailma of the Punjab. The lies of this liar are as visible as the sun at meridian. In the context of these lies, the arch Liar cannot remain hidden from those whose hearts glow with the light of Faith, however faint. But those eyes which are totally sealed, Allah has been pleased to say about them:

"And the person who shall be blind in this world shall be blind in the hereafter also and will be strayed more from the path".

How can a blind man tell the truth from the untruth or distinguish the white from the black? Let this one example suffice for Mirza's falsehood.

MARRIAGE WITH MUHAMMADI BEGUM IN THE SKY!
Mirza declared the so-called revelation that he had been married with Muhammadi Begum, a respectable lady, in the sky. He kept on harping on this revelation of marriage from 1888 to 1907. Ultimately he wrote these words in his Appendix to Anjam e Atham on page 54.

"Remember, if the second part of this predication does not come true (i.e. Muhammadi Begum is not married to Mirza after her widowhood), I should be deemed more wicked than any wicked man. O idiots! this is not a human's pretension. This is no business of any depraved impostor. Consider this to be God's true promise, definitely the same God Almighty Whose words are never withdrawn; the same Glorious Nourisher Whose intentions nobody can stop".

Certainly we agree and do believe that Allah's words are His Will. His promises are true, unbreakable and uncontradictary, unflinching and unswerving. Nobody can stop His intents.

MIRZA DID NOT EVEN SEEN THE SHADOW OF HIS ILLUSIVE BRIDE
But what happened to the second part of Mirza's prediction? Far from marriage, Mirza did not see even the shadow of his illusive bride, Muhammadi Begum. Is the falsehood of foul and fraudulent Mirza not proved thus? He himself admitted in his own words that he was a very wicked man, more wicked than any other wicked. Jews, Christians, Hindus, Sikhs, cobblers, sweepers, etc., are also non-Muslims but Mirza admits he is worse than all of them.

Does any doubt still remain of his being an Arch Liar, an impostor, a pretender, nay, the worst of them all? This is one example I have mentioned, otherwise, Allah the Exalted, has provided us with a collection of proofs not in hundreds but in thousands.

MIRZA ALREADY VANQUISHED IN SEVERAL MUBAHALAS

Besides these testimonies, Mirza Ghulam Ahmad Qadiani had already conducted a number of Mubahalas with the people. The result invariably was that Allah, the Exalted, showed him up as the Arch-Liar.

INTERESTING SESSION WITH A CHRISITAN PRIEST
Mirza Qadiani convened a discussion with a local head of episcopal diocese, named Atham. For fifteen days argumentation continued. When he could not beat his adversary he invoked Allah for decision. He pronounced that Allah had made this decision for Atham that this liar should be thrown into 'Havia' (hell) within fifteen months from June 5, 1893. Mirza had predicted in these words:

"BLACKEN MY FACE: PUT ROPE AROUND MY NECK":

"I admit right now that if this prediction goes false, i.e., if within fifteen months from this day, the party who is deemed to be false in Allah's view does not fall into 'Havia' as death punishment then I am prepared to undergo every type of punishment: disgrace me, blacken my face, collar a rope around my neck or hang me on the gallows. I am prepared for all. I swear by the Greatness of Allah that He will certainly do the same, will certainly do the same, will certainly do the same. The earth and the sky may deviate but not His Ordainments. If I am a liar keep the gallows ready for me and consider me the most accursed of all the accursed persons, the evil-doers and the satans". (From Jung e Muqaddas, p.189).

HULLABALOO IN QADIAN ON THE CRITICAL NIGHT
The night before the avowed date-line, the town of Qadian went into a tumultuous drone. Men, women, big and small rubbed their noses on the earth, lamenting: Ya Allah, Atham may die! Ya Allah, Atham be dead! Ya Allah Atham may die! They were certain that Atham would no more live to see the light of the fixed day. Mirza Ghulam Ahmad Qadiani, on his part, worked out spells of magic for Atham's death and had charms recited over black grams and thrown them into dry wells. Despite all these invocations, contrivances and holloas, Atham remained alive and lived on and on. By His actions Allah. the Exalted testified that:

*the prediction was not a revelation from Allah;
*the prediction was Mirza's imposture;
*both Mirza & Atham were liars but Mirza was the Arch Liar;
*Mirza deserved the punishment he had proposed on himself, that is "Disgrace me"; "Blacken my face"; "Collar a rope around my neck;" "Hang me on the gallows"

After this Divine Decision, is there any further need, Mirza Tahir! for the Mubahala you wish to hold?

b. WITH MAULANA GHAZNAVI
On the 10th Zeeqada, 1310 Hijri, Mirza Qadiani, by appointment with Hazrat Maulana Abdul Haq Ghaznavi came out in the Eidgah of Amritsar for Mubahala. The invoked curses told upon Mirza and as a result he tumbled out of life with his heels twirling and his legs twining, whereas, the celebrated Maulana Sahib lived on respectably, sound and magnificent. Is any Divine testimony still needed to prove that Mirza Ghulam Ahmad was in the wrong!

c. MUBAHALA WITH MAULANA SANAULLAH
On April 15, 1907, Mirza Qadiani published all announcement for holding his favourite "Curses Rendezvous" of Mubahala. His announcement was published in the form of an advertisement the title ~of which was:

'FINAL DECISION WITH MAULVI SANAULLAH AMRITSARI'

In this announcement, he beseeched Allah with extreme earnestness and implored most humbly. The invocation on his lips: "Take away the life of whosoever is the Liar during the life-time of the one who is not. Let the death of the liar not be caused by any human hand but by a fatal disease such as Cholera. Plague or the like".

In the advertisement he addressed Maulana Sanaullah Sahib in these words:

"In your paper, you have built up this reputation for me that this person is a pretender, a liar and 'Dajjal' (the one-eyed anti-Christ impostor). I have borne a lot of tortures from you, still I endured them patiently.. If I am a liar and impostor, as you call me in your paper, then I should perish in your life-time because, I know, liars and mischief-mongers do not live long. The liar ultimately meets his doom in a state of intense grief and contemptuousness, in front of his foe. It is better he perishes lest he should mislead Allah's creatures".

"If I am not a liar or pretender;
"if Allah blesses me by holding dialogues with me;
"if I am the promised Messiah";
"then by Allah's Munificence, according to His Practice, I hope that you will not be able to save yourself from His punishment, which He inflicts on disowning liars.
"Therefore if that punishment, which is not in the hands of a human being but only in Allah's hands, such as Plague, Cholera and similar fatal disease, does not descend upon you in my life-time, then I am not God-sent. This prediction is not because of any revelation or inspiration; it's merely a prayer I have invoked to Allah for His Decision".

At the end of this advertisement, Mirza Qadiani wrote:
"Ultimately, my request to Maulvi Sahib is that he should publish this entire writing of mine in his paper and write underneath whatever he wants because now the decision rests with Allah".

THE FINALE
The decision came out soon, in front of all. Mirza was hale and hearty by 10 o'clock at night on May 25, 1908. He had already taken his dinner. At 10 p.m. Allah's cudgel of punishment suddenly fell on him. He lay victimised by Cholera, the same Cholera he had invoked for others. Filth oozed out from both of his body orifices. Soon he lost his speech and within twelve hours lay dead. That was May 26, 1908. On the other hand, Maulana Sanaullah Amritsari lived for full forty-one years after Mirza's death and the Maulana departed into Allah's Mercy and Grace in 1949. That came about after the establishment of Pakistan. He was united with Allah at Sargodha. May Allah grant him ample compassion.

MIRZA--SATANS COMMISSIONER
In view of this decision and in Mirza's circumstantial death, there is all the proof of his being a great pretender and an arch-liar. Neither was he the promised Messiah nor was he commissioned by Allah. It was Satan who had commissioned him.

Mirza Tahir Sahib! Is there any further need now for a Mubahala after this Divine Decision?

Moulana Muhammad Yusuf Ludhianwi

Answered by
Moulana Muhammad Yusuf Ludhianwi
View original Ask AskImam directly

Fatawa SA is an independent, read-only index of fatawa already published by Darul Iftaa Mahmudiyyah (AskImam). It is not a fatwa service. For your own situation, ask the issuing Darul Ifta directly.